Have you read the January 5, 2009 article entitled “High-End Help for Job Hunters” published in The Wall Street Journal? Presumably, the con artist David Werner has gathered all his talents and connections to get Joann S. Lublin to write this article.
The article is quite interesting and, to Joann’s credit, exposes David Werner International with subtlety and elegance. In the article Werner comments on two of his clients; a Mr. Craig Schmeizer and Steven L’Heureux. Apparently, Craig is happy with Werner however, Steven is not. The astonishing part about the article is that Werner is argumentative, belligerent and defiant towards his client Mr. L’Heureux. Instead of acknowledging that, perhaps David Werner International did not successfully serve his client, the con artist is argumentative and attempts to demonstrate that his is rite and that his client is wrong.
Mr. L’Heureux is one of many clients who have been scammed by the con artist David Werner. Unfortunately, Mr. L’Heureux may have not done his homework before signing the DWIC agreement. As a result, Mr. L’Heureux has been scammed $22,000. Mr. L’Heureux, should take some comfort in the fact that his $22,000 is less than many others who have been conned out of $30,000, $40,000 and much more.
We have to give Werner some credit for succeeding in using his con artist skills to use Joann to distribute misinformation and create an aura of success and desirability for his scam. Where have you read recently about an individual who created an aura of exclusivity and privilege? Who has been using the psychology of creating an environment which is blinding people and entice them to forfeit research about the scam to which they are about to lose large amount of cash? Who by coincidence has been doing this for over 30 years? If the name Madoff does not come to mind, you have been in a cave for the past 60 days and you may very well deserve to be swindled by David Werner International.
Joann, the WSJ reporter, has been used because she accepted information which is false and which attempts to create the same aura of exclusivity and desirability, the same psychology that Madoff used. Werner states and Joann writes:
“About 100 Wall Street executives requested assistance during 2008 from David Werner International Corp., a New York executive marketing firm that serves just four individuals a month.”
David Werner International “swindles” 8 people a month. He stated this verbally back in 2006. If he now handles only 4 swindles per month than, his business has decreased by 50%. This could be very plausible since, for the past two years his scam has bee well exposed on the Internet.
But the subtle and most dangerous aspect of this scam, like Madoff, Werner states and Joann writes:
”David Werner International Corp., a New York executive marketing firm that serves just four individuals a month”
This is the exclusivity statement which is design to create the aura of privilege and difficulty of access, just like Madoff, and which is design to create desire and entice negligence in due-diligence research.
Any business faced with increased demand will expand not turn away clients. On the other hand this is not a business, is a scam and these people are not clients, they are “marks” setup to gamble their money and, like any gamble, lose ….BIG! $25,000, $30,000, $40,000 and more.
The article is quite interesting and, to Joann’s credit, exposes David Werner International with subtlety and elegance. In the article Werner comments on two of his clients; a Mr. Craig Schmeizer and Steven L’Heureux. Apparently, Craig is happy with Werner however, Steven is not. The astonishing part about the article is that Werner is argumentative, belligerent and defiant towards his client Mr. L’Heureux. Instead of acknowledging that, perhaps David Werner International did not successfully serve his client, the con artist is argumentative and attempts to demonstrate that his is rite and that his client is wrong.
Mr. L’Heureux is one of many clients who have been scammed by the con artist David Werner. Unfortunately, Mr. L’Heureux may have not done his homework before signing the DWIC agreement. As a result, Mr. L’Heureux has been scammed $22,000. Mr. L’Heureux, should take some comfort in the fact that his $22,000 is less than many others who have been conned out of $30,000, $40,000 and much more.
We have to give Werner some credit for succeeding in using his con artist skills to use Joann to distribute misinformation and create an aura of success and desirability for his scam. Where have you read recently about an individual who created an aura of exclusivity and privilege? Who has been using the psychology of creating an environment which is blinding people and entice them to forfeit research about the scam to which they are about to lose large amount of cash? Who by coincidence has been doing this for over 30 years? If the name Madoff does not come to mind, you have been in a cave for the past 60 days and you may very well deserve to be swindled by David Werner International.
Joann, the WSJ reporter, has been used because she accepted information which is false and which attempts to create the same aura of exclusivity and desirability, the same psychology that Madoff used. Werner states and Joann writes:
“About 100 Wall Street executives requested assistance during 2008 from David Werner International Corp., a New York executive marketing firm that serves just four individuals a month.”
David Werner International “swindles” 8 people a month. He stated this verbally back in 2006. If he now handles only 4 swindles per month than, his business has decreased by 50%. This could be very plausible since, for the past two years his scam has bee well exposed on the Internet.
But the subtle and most dangerous aspect of this scam, like Madoff, Werner states and Joann writes:
”David Werner International Corp., a New York executive marketing firm that serves just four individuals a month”
This is the exclusivity statement which is design to create the aura of privilege and difficulty of access, just like Madoff, and which is design to create desire and entice negligence in due-diligence research.
Any business faced with increased demand will expand not turn away clients. On the other hand this is not a business, is a scam and these people are not clients, they are “marks” setup to gamble their money and, like any gamble, lose ….BIG! $25,000, $30,000, $40,000 and more.
